WARNING: Just thinking out aloud here, nothing groundbreaking-

Twitter really leveraged the concept of an Asymmetric follow . i.e. I can find people I’m interested in, irrespective of our relationship, and learn from what they have to share. Similarly, Others can include me in their lists. It mimics real life, i.e. there are asymmetric levels of interest in all our relationships.
It also mimics real life since friendship grows with complete strangers over time only by communicating with them. In fact, through Twitter’s wonderful system of @ messages I find myself having conversations with complete strangers so many times. Most humans react positivley to attention, so we follow our @ messages more faithfully than our actual twitter streams.

Now comes the thinking aloud part:
Since the users have been warming up to the concept of lists, could twitter (or any network app) as a next step allow users to send directed messages ? For example: I have two very distinct set of followers on twitter 1) People in Bloomington 2) Techy/geeky friends from all over. The B-ton folks might like what I have to say about B-ton and everything else, but my techy/geeky friends from everywhere else might not be interested in what is happening at b-tons @bluebird bar tonight. Since there are specific lists that I follow, for example the really well curated list of Bloomington tweeple , I could plausibly @message the list & it would only show up in the twitter streams of my followers from that list . Or, since twitter already allows users to mention their location, I could @~ or @# a location ( e.g. @~bloomington or @#bloomington,IN ) when I tweet.

There could be many more interesting ways of using this, without making it into a twitter-HTML . Facebook already tries to do the same in very confusing and inefficient ways (my opinion). I hope Google buzz would have something on these lines. (This chain of thought started when I heard that google buzz, which mysteriously has not yet (1am,feb 10) shown up in my account, had mimicked twitter’s asymmetric follow.)

Have you noticed the language being used on twitter ? Just have a look at random posts corporate executives, who presumably are using the most appropriate and decent form of Twitter-English ie. Twinglish :

jeffBooth “shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world” – Jack Welch. New blog post on why I agree. http://tinyurl.com/cfha22
gweston: There so few companies we trust absolutely? I trust Costco, Southwest Discount Tire? Isn’t “Trust” the best strategy for all businesses?
Padmasree Good article, like the analysis. Prefer gender neutral terms NOT “top young guns and older bulls” Come on @vwadhwa http://j.mp/h2BDi

A few points to note:

• To the point- practical use of language
• No flowery intros. No “good news-bad news-good news” formatting
• Minor grammatical mistakes are OK !
• Bullet point talk is trendy

So here is my point, the 140 char limit is a cultural leveler. First language or not everyone has to fit their thoughts into 140 char. This makes internationals (Europeans, Chinese, Indians), who are in the habit of writing long-winded sentences – cut back . On the other hand it also prevents native English speakers come straight to the content. It does not give them a chance to begin with ” I like the work you have done here . Vere interesting, but can redo the whole thing because ……” . In Twinglish you would have to go  staright ” We will need to redo … because…”

This gives English an engineering approach . I think this is a trend for the better, but you might disagree.