<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media paradigms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbanturbanguy.com/social-media-paradigms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbanturbanguy.com/social-media-paradigms/</link>
	<description>marketing, technology &#38; design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gagan</title>
		<link>http://urbanturbanguy.com/social-media-paradigms/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Gagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanturbanguy.com/?p=225#comment-84</guid>
		<description>@Rashmi, 
Thanks for the in-depth review. 

There is a lot of feedback I have received on this model and will be posting an updated model soon. 

Just to touch the questions you have raised: 
The case study in itself is an attempt to document &quot;those paradigms&quot; that exist in the &quot;black box&quot;. Our initial categorization for them being &quot; listening, efficiency improvement &amp; Awareness generation ) &quot; . 

The Business objectives can be tiered, like when we say Brand &amp; Demand Generation they could be sequential as well as independent effects of a &quot;black box&quot;campaign.

..working on your inputs. 

We hope to end up with a lean- jargon free model at the end though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rashmi,<br />
Thanks for the in-depth review. </p>
<p>There is a lot of feedback I have received on this model and will be posting an updated model soon. </p>
<p>Just to touch the questions you have raised:<br />
The case study in itself is an attempt to document &#8220;those paradigms&#8221; that exist in the &#8220;black box&#8221;. Our initial categorization for them being &#8221; listening, efficiency improvement &#038; Awareness generation ) &#8221; . </p>
<p>The Business objectives can be tiered, like when we say Brand &#038; Demand Generation they could be sequential as well as independent effects of a &#8220;black box&#8221;campaign.</p>
<p>..working on your inputs. </p>
<p>We hope to end up with a lean- jargon free model at the end though <img src='http://urbanturbanguy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rashmi Manda</title>
		<link>http://urbanturbanguy.com/social-media-paradigms/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Rashmi Manda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanturbanguy.com/?p=225#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Overall, a good framework that links social media with business objectives - $. I follow your thinking but have a couple of points to add based on my experience......[Note: My definition of social media includes all the channels such as tritter, facebook, youtube etc and also web 2.0 technologies which provide a new platform to engage with customers and partners. ]

What are the key aspects that really matter to a company in connection with social media? You listed these aspects as: Building awareness, efficiency and listening which drive cost savings and sales. I&#039;ll add a little more. 

Social Media, if well managed, aims to benefit the company in the following ways: 
•	BRAND (Awareness + Monitoring + depth of customer engagement)
•	Demand Generation (SoMe = new marketing channel + reach*frequency  Revenue)
•	Cost Savings (through collaboration, co-innovation and shorter product lifecycles through web 2.0 AND marketing through social media sites is free  AND higher ROI on marketing dollars )
•	In addition what $ value would you attach to the “immediate impact” of a news/product/anything that spreads virally? (immediate impact  demand generation)

Consequently my diagram would look a little different. It would start with SoMe and ends with $ that signifies revenue, growth etc. SoMe level is  followed by a black-box which contains all the ‘activities’ which a company does on social media and web 2.0. These activities could be : brand awareness, brand monitoring, community engagement, marketing, advertizing, collaboration, co-innovation, product lifecycle management etc…. ALL the possible things that a company can do on social media.  This is a black box because every team pursues social media with a different objective and also because the “use case scenarios” are still evolving…….To recap: SoMe  Blackbox 

When you step back and look at the ‘activities’ that comprise the black-box – patterns emerge and we can categorize these patterns in some ‘buckets’.  These ‘buckets’ signify business objectives that aim for the ultimate - $. [Re-cap: SoMe  Blackbox Business objectives  $]. These business objectives are the same as what I listed above : BRAND, DEMAND GENERATION, COST SAVINGS, IMMEDIATE IMPACT. Now I’m comfortable talking about how brand affects $ and how demand generation affects $.......makes sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall, a good framework that links social media with business objectives &#8211; $. I follow your thinking but have a couple of points to add based on my experience&#8230;&#8230;[Note: My definition of social media includes all the channels such as tritter, facebook, youtube etc and also web 2.0 technologies which provide a new platform to engage with customers and partners. ]</p>
<p>What are the key aspects that really matter to a company in connection with social media? You listed these aspects as: Building awareness, efficiency and listening which drive cost savings and sales. I&#8217;ll add a little more. </p>
<p>Social Media, if well managed, aims to benefit the company in the following ways:<br />
•	BRAND (Awareness + Monitoring + depth of customer engagement)<br />
•	Demand Generation (SoMe = new marketing channel + reach*frequency  Revenue)<br />
•	Cost Savings (through collaboration, co-innovation and shorter product lifecycles through web 2.0 AND marketing through social media sites is free  AND higher ROI on marketing dollars )<br />
•	In addition what $ value would you attach to the “immediate impact” of a news/product/anything that spreads virally? (immediate impact  demand generation)</p>
<p>Consequently my diagram would look a little different. It would start with SoMe and ends with $ that signifies revenue, growth etc. SoMe level is  followed by a black-box which contains all the ‘activities’ which a company does on social media and web 2.0. These activities could be : brand awareness, brand monitoring, community engagement, marketing, advertizing, collaboration, co-innovation, product lifecycle management etc…. ALL the possible things that a company can do on social media.  This is a black box because every team pursues social media with a different objective and also because the “use case scenarios” are still evolving…….To recap: SoMe  Blackbox </p>
<p>When you step back and look at the ‘activities’ that comprise the black-box – patterns emerge and we can categorize these patterns in some ‘buckets’.  These ‘buckets’ signify business objectives that aim for the ultimate &#8211; $. [Re-cap: SoMe  Blackbox Business objectives  $]. These business objectives are the same as what I listed above : BRAND, DEMAND GENERATION, COST SAVINGS, IMMEDIATE IMPACT. Now I’m comfortable talking about how brand affects $ and how demand generation affects $&#8230;&#8230;.makes sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

