How Direct Messaging (DM) trumps Instant Messaging (IM)

oh its her again. reply or not, Its a mess, either ways . why the hell did I leave my gtalk status online !

…unwanted chat pings, feeling awkward while closing a conversation, don’t know if ur reply will be missed as they log out.

Well that is what i call the transactional mental burden of an IM (gtalk, yahoo cha, AOL messenger ).
DM (direct messaging) on microblogs (twitter, identi.ca, yammer..) wins on all counts- no one will ever “miss” a direct messages, they have their own repository, there is no urgency in replying ( a real emergency would warrant a phone call not an IM or a DM) and I can remain in my zone away from the unwanted pings.

On top of it I am not tied to the chat client – I can access my microblogger from websites, browser apps, desktop apps and even over the phone. None of it is a push, i.e. microblog when I like, where I like.For an added plus – everyone in the twitter stream is a contact I can chat with ! I dont need to search for their email addreses to add them to the chat client !

So here is what DM’s trum IM’s in :
1) location / device independence
2) response time flexibility
3) scalable friends list
Though I think spam is till an issue with DM’s but Its is much less embarrassing than the unwanted pop-up at the wrong time!

And if you really really need to talk to me call me ;) .

Have you switched to a DM only mode yet ?

Web Business Models

While brainstorming about monetizing models in social media for a prospective client, we wavered to a discussion on business models that exist in the web2.0 world. I wanted to jot them down for comment and critique:
1. Freemium: Give away a Basic version of the software/service to users/”prospects” for free. Those prospects become customers, buy purchasing more space, superior service and/or enhanced features. There are three kind of upgrade transactions out there:

  • Time based subscription, with recurring payments at monthly, quarterly or yearly periods
  • Utility based billing, with payments related to bandwidth usage or number of transactions
  • lifetime subscription, with a one time payment for a license
  • limited trial, with the complete product or service available only for some limited time and continued usage is contingent to payment  ( no “free basic version” , makes is slightly different from the other freemium models)

2. Free

  • Advertisement supported: Applications with a targeted user demographic or a large user base
  • Branded promotional web-applications
  • Donor supported

3. Broker: Charging a percentage fee on the transaction from a third party, for a service .

4. Merchant: Selling data/products that were sold offline. This can further be divided into click and mortar, virtual & catalog merchants.

5. Affiliate: leveraging the existing customer base of an affiliated partner to sell ones product or service.

did I miss something ? do they overlap ?

Urban Turban Guy ?

The turban has long signified an inquisitive learner and an attempt to be in harmony with the the changes in the world. While the “new urban” is defined by technology.

This blog is home to my inquisitions on marketing, design and technology in general, and social media in particular.
Hence the name, urbanTurbanGuy a turbaned perspective on the “new urbanity”.

Rss feed for Urban Turban GUY :)
email feed for Urban Turban GUY :)
Keep twitter tabs on me :)